Home
home
- Details
- Written by Super User
- Category: Uncategorised
- Hits: 2320
THIS SITE IS MAINTAINED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING ADVERTISMENTS!
THE ENTIRE LIST OF PUBLISHED ARTICLES AND NEWSLETTERS CAN BE ACCESSED ON
RE-EVALUATING THE FOUNDATION OF PARTICLE PHYSICS
FAKING THE SCIENCE FOR PUPILS PART XXIV
Lately. I concentrated my efforts on a groundbreaking article analyzing the foundation of particle physics and why there is a need for a complete re-evaluation of this branch.
The article was submitted to be published in two top journals: Nature Physics and Physical Review D, but unfortunately, both these journals deny its publishing, without making any comments.
What is this article about?
The paper re-evaluates the discovery of positron and offers in a new perspective for some old facts which have become a footnote of history instead of laying at the foundation of particle physics.
One of the most iconic picture in physics, i.e. the photo of a positron in a cloud chamber, is showing how this particle is traveling through normal matter and having multiple interactions with bulk matter, without having an immediate process of annihilation as the theory preaches.
The same positron is loosing about 40 MeV energy by interacting with a lead plate in the cloud chamber and again, it does not undergo an annihilation process!
Another iconic picture in particle physics, i.e. the pair particle-antiparticle generation, is analysed and the situation is not so pink for the mainstream community...
This is again confirming that positron moves through matter without immediate annihilation as the theory foresees, but there are other supplementary facts to be taken into consideration.
Even for a laymen estimation, the trajectory of the positron is not symmetrical to that of an electron and this means that positron characteristics are close, but different from those of an electron!
Positron mass or charge, or maybe both, have to be different from those of an electron!
In case a positron would be identical to an electron, but with opposite charge sign, the trajectory of a positron in has to be symmetrical like a mirror image for the trajectory of an electron.
Only a visual comparison, without any mathematical approach, shows this is not the case!
Furthermore, the motion of electron and positron observed after pair generation does not fit into the pattern of an accelerated or decelerated motion where an electric force is present!
The initial gamma photon has a simple linear motion as far there is no electric interaction between photons and matter.
Once a positron and an electron are created, even in the most advanced vacuum, there has to be an electric interaction between these particles as far there is no possibility to screen their electric interaction!
Immediately an electron and a positron are generated, and they are very close each others, there is also a very strong electrical interaction between these particles as far an electric force given by the formula – ke2/r2 is generated!
As the electron and positron moves farther apart each other, this electric force decreases as strength.
{unsubscribe}Unsubscribe{/unsubscribe}
The process of particle-antiparticle generation contradicts the present special relativity as far these particles have to be generated with a higher energy as that requested by this theory!
By omitting the electrical interaction between positron and electron, the energy threshold is artificially lowered, i.e., faking the facts!
Well, in my opinion, this situation offers an opportunity for an inquiring mind to question the ,,existence” of the famous electric interaction force between elementary particles too!
Do such force really exists in case of elementary particles?
It is high time to start a quantitative approach for the entire particle physics branch, but this has to wait until some funds are secured.
Well, it is a bit ironical and funny for the mainstream science that in more than one century, no one observed that what happen in a simple cloud chamber demolishes the entire electromagnetism and quantum theory too....
This old experimental reality combined with other accepted fake information show that entire particle physics has to be rebuilt from scratch.
Section 1 presents this article and why such info cannot be found in the mainstream journals of physics.
Section II is presenting a letter I adressed to the EU Commisiion in june 2025.
Time was hectic for me and I did not have the time to complete this newsletter with a more detailed analysis of what happen around the world lately, but anyway all I have written in that letter is coming to fruition.
Trump chaos revolution is in full swing and for many unskilled people, it is quite difficult to fully grasp the long term consequences of policies implemented by present US administration.
As I already foreseen, being in impossibility to confine and hurt the BRICS+ countries, Trump has chosen to bully its allies.
Have you seen a classical American movie with a mafia boss, who is punishing his gang after being humiliated by a rival gang?
With the Trump 2.0 ascent, the entire US foreign politics resumes to this simple deviant comportment of a boss mafia, who needs some subservient people to whom to discharge his anger and frustration, as far the other gangs are ,,becoming” stronger and not willing to play after his rules.
In theory, US is still dreaming to be a hegemon, and from this posture, it can still create a lot of chaos with the help of the subservient NATO countries.
In reality, US is mostly a paper hegemon and without a strong leader with a clear mind able to change gears toward another future, the situation will soon become unbearable....
Well, by bullying its allies and eventually some other countries, US can still remain in the lead of the western coalition and a regional power.
The trade agreements with EU, Japan, Korea, etc. Are a simple example of how US can still maintain a dominant position for some time.
The government of Japan and Korea are at least entitled to sign such trade agreements with US, but I doubt about the legality of what Ursula agreed with Trump during a golf match break!
As I already highlighted, everything what Trump was asking had to be agreed by the EU leaders, as far without Trump support, their political careers end abruptly...
It will be curious to see what changes in EU regulations are to be made in order for EU countries to become unique clients for the US LNG!
The problem is that EU has no capacity to process the equivalent of 250 billion $ LNG for a year and this is a simple problem of logistic which cannot be solved with an EU regulation or with a drawing on a paper.
Or maybe the EU wants to pay the US not double of triple the market price but five times the market LNG price, and in this case things are making sense.
LNG needs investment before being processed and, especially in the EU, building a LNG facility needs times and a nightmarish bureaucracy.
It will be curious to further see what change in EU regulations are to be made in order for the EU companies to be forced to invest a huge amount of money in the US!
Most of the relevant EU companies already fled to US or China due to the EU energy crisis and the expensive LNG coming from the US.
Probably the EU is preparing another wave of companies migration outside EU, as far the energy crisis cannot be solved and this migration is preferred instead of bankruptcy.
Anyway, assuming this EU-US trade agreement is implemented in the present form, by the end of Trump mandate, the EU will have the same statute for US as the Samoa Islands!
This in case EU still resists up to that moment....
For most of the common EU citizens, the EU Commission has been failing in any big project or ideology they tried to promote for some decades.
Yet, instead of going toward the drain of history, they are trying to cosmetic the situation and to reinvent themselves as the saviors of Europe!
The problem is ,,project Ukraine” cannot be pushed under the carpet so easily without holding some people accountable...
But, as in any ,,well established” democratic system, the present leaders are doing everything possible to push the can down the road, with the hope the future will be better....
For the moment, there is no money in the vaults to be spent on project Ukraine, so the EU Commission is redefining ,,theft” as a lucrative financial operation and is prepared to use the Russian frozen assets for prolonging the war in Ukraine...
Some bureaucrats do not understand that this proxy NATO war is already lost and any peace settlement has to take into account the winner!
The reality of attrition war is much different from what some bureaucrats in Brussels are imagining...
Holding the line and losing small incremental pieces of land, does not qualify Ukrainian army as equal with the Russian army!
In an attrition war, when there are no people to serve as meat grinders, the entire front is collapsing and Ukraine is close to this turning point...
By prolonging this war, the EU Commission is making a disservice to any EU citizen and is condemning future generations to pay for their idiocy ...
An EU Commission acting like a military structure is not what many of the present EU countries signed for!
The entire EU is figuratively speaking on fire and no one is able to explain a bunch of EU functionaries that extinguishing the fire has to be their first priority!
But when entire EU is on the verge of collapse, the only preoccupation of EU leaders is to have the highest military budget in the world.
They haven't learned an iota regarding war expenses and war economy!
Even with more than a trillion euro budget for military expenses, EU cannot fight Russia as equals.
The army industry in the EU is functioning after the idea of obtaining the maximum profit possible and is not a ,,state” controlled industry.
As consequence, the main purpose of a company delivering military techniques is to increase their profits and not support an extensive war.
How is someone going to build a tank somewhere in Europe, when the steel has to be imported from China or India, countries which are supposed to be under sanctions soon?
An army consumes a lot of fossil fuel which is scarce in Europe!
Have you ever seen an EU directive to force the conversion of defense industry to renewable?
Russia is outproducing the entire NATO in respect to the military technique as far most of its defense industry is still controlled by the state, energy is cheap and metallurgy industry is still working there.
The EU and US have to look again at their economic theory and try to understand how Russia with a military budget of about 130 billion $ is outpacing the entire NATO with a total military budget of more than 1,5 trillion $!
Furthermore, there is no one to explain to a bunch of well paid EU functionaries that real progress and real economic growth cannot be achieved through increased military expenses!
Well, as US support for Ukraine war is dwindling, some EU leaders are already pushing forward for a direct war with Russia which is a complete insanity....
Keep in touch!
The link to this newsletter:
https://www.pleistoros.com/en/newsletters